|
In the early 1990s,
there was a marked increase in the number of seals killed by sharks in the
waters around Sable Island. Each year since then, a few hundred carcasses of shark-killed seals - grey, harbour, harp, hooded and ringed seals - are found washed ashore on
Sable Island. A study of shark predation on seals has been underway on the
island since 1993 and selected results are reported in several publications
(see Additional Reading, below). A final manuscript, in collaboration with
Lisa Natanson (Apex Predators Group, National Marine Fisheries Service,
Narragansett Lab, Rhode Island), is in preparation.
Shark predation on
pinnipeds - seals, sea lions and fur seals - is a well- documented
phenomenon. Shark-inflicted mortality may be a significant factor in the
biology and behaviour of many pinniped species, influencing, for example,
diving patterns, timing of breeding season, length of suckling period, and
population dynamics. Reported shark predation on pinnipeds most often
involves great white shark Carcharodon carcharias (e.g. California
and South Africa) and tiger shark Galeocerdo cuvier (e.g. Hawaii).
During the last twenty
years actual shark attacks on Sable Island seals have been witnessed only a
dozen times, most often from seismic boats working near the island. The
observers were not able to identify the shark species involved. However,
based on observations and specimens collected since 1993 - wound patterns,
score marks on bone and tooth fragments - it appears that several species
are responsible, including great white shark.
However, of the various
wound patterns seen in the seal carcasses washed ashore on Sable Island, by
far the most common is a peculiar clean-edged `cut' (termed "corkscrew")
which is quite unlike wounds characteristic of attacks by great white, tiger
and mako Isurus oxyrinchus sharks recorded elsewhere. Also,
occurrence of the corkscrew wound peaks during winter - a season when such
sharks are unlikely to be in the area. Thus, of the several shark species
involved in predation on seals at Sable Island, at least one of them is not
among the "usual suspects".
During the first year of
the study it became apparent that the corkscrew wound was not consistent
with what was then known of the predatory behaviour of various shark
species. Photographs of the wounds were sent to seal and shark researchers
in many countries including Norway, Scotland, Australia, New Zealand and
South Africa, and to numerous scientists on the east and west coasts of
North America. The amount of time spent in such `investigation' almost
equaled the amount of time spent collecting data on the beach. Although none
reported seeing similar wounds, many people shared information about
predation and wound patterns observed elsewhere - all of which suggested
that the nature and scale of shark predation at Sable Island comprised a
unique, albeit perplexing, phenomenon.
As the study proceeded,
consideration of the jaw and tooth structure of various sharks suggested
that the species responsible for the corkscrew wound might be the Greenland
shark Somniosus microcephalus. Discussions with Jack Casey and Wes
Pratt (Apex Predators Group, NMFS) and review of historical documents
supported this theory, and interviews with Nova Scotian fishermen confirmed
that Greenland sharks were certainly in the Sable Island area. While much
other `circumstantial evidence' has also implicated this species, until
actual attacks are witnessed and documented, the role of the Greenland shark in predation on seals
around Sable Island will be a matter of speculation, albeit well-founded
speculation. |